Strategy Instruction
The ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education (ERIC EC)
E-mail: webmaster@hoagiesgifted.org
Internet: http://eric.hoagiesgifted.org
ERIC EC Digest #E638
Author: Pat Beckman
December 2002
For more than two decades there has been an abundance of research regarding strategy instruction. Originally, most of this research focused on the effects of strategy instruction on students with learning disabilities. Researchers are currently looking at how strategy instruction affects all learners.
What is a strategy?
In general, a strategy is a tool, plan, or method used for accomplishing a task.
Below are other terms associated with strategy instruction, some of which are
discussed in this digest:
- Cognitive Strategy: a strategy or group of strategies or procedures that
the learner uses to perform academic tasks or to improve social skills. Often,
more than one cognitive strategy is used with others, depending on the learner
and his/her schema for learning. In fact, research indicates that successful
learners use numerous strategies. Some of these strategies include visualization,
verbalization, making associations, chunking, questioning, scanning, underlining,
accessing cues, using mnemonics, sounding out words, and self-checking and
monitoring.
- Cues: visual or verbal prompts to either remind the student what has already
been learned or provide an opportunity to learn something new. Cues can also
be employed to prompt student use of a strategy.
- Independent, Strategic Learner: the student who uses cues and strategies
within his/her learning schema, asks clarifying questions, listens, checks
and monitors his/her work and behavior, and sets personal goals. A strategic
learner knows the value of using particular strategies through experience,
and is eager to learn others that might prove beneficial.
- Learning Strategy: a set of steps to accomplish a particular task, such
as taking a test, comprehending text, and writing a story. A first-letter
mnemonic is often used to help the learner follow the steps of the strategy.
- Metacognition and Self-regulation: the understanding a person has about
how he/she learns (personal learning schema) including the strategies used
to accomplish tasks, and the process by which the learner oversees and monitors
his/her use of strategies.
- Mnemonic: a device for remembering, such as a first-letter mnemonic for
writing: PLAN (Pay attention to the prompt, List main ideas, Add supporting
ideas, Number your ideas) (DeLaPaz, Owen, Harris and Graham, 2000). Rhyme,
rhythm, music, and key-word mnemonics are also useful memory tools.
- Strategy Instruction: teaching students about strategies, teaching them
how and when to use strategies, helping students identify personally effective
strategies, and encouraging them to make strategic behaviors part of their
learning schema.
- Learning Schema: the sets, or mixes, of strategies that the individual learner
uses automatically to perform, produce, communicate, or learn. It can take years
to develop a personal learning schema.
What has been learned about the effectiveness of strategy instruction?
Many students' ability to learn has been increased through the deliberate teaching
of cognitive and metacognitive strategies. This is especially true for students
with significant learning problems-strategy instruction is crucial for them.
It has been demonstrated that when struggling students are taught strategies
and are given ample encouragement, feedback, and opportunities to use them,
students improve in their ability to process information, which, in turn, leads
to improved learning. Because not all students will find it easy to imbed strategy
use in their learning schema, differentiation of strategies instruction is required,
with some students needing more scaffolding and individualized, intensive instruction
than others.
Why is it important to teach children to be strategic?
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 1997 and the No Child
Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 focus on improved achievement by all students.
IDEA mandates that all students access and progress in the general education
curriculum. This includes students with disabilities, English language learners,
and gifted students. NCLB has established performance goals that drive the efforts
of public schools, especially in establishing proficiency in reading/language
arts and mathematics by all students by the year 2013-2014. The outcomes listed
below help ensure student progress. Additionally, when students become strategic,
independent learners, they also become literate and productive lifelong learners.
What happens to students when they become strategic?
The following outcomes can be expected:
- Students trust their minds.
- Students know there's more than one right way to do things.
- They acknowledge their mistakes and try to rectify them.
- They evaluate their products and behavior.
- Memories are enhanced.
- Learning increases.
- Self-esteem increases.
- Students feel a sense of power.
- Students become more responsible
- Work completion and accuracy improve.
- Students develop and use a personal study process.
- They know how to "try."
- On-task time increases; students are more "engaged."
What are the most essential strategies to teach?
This is determined, in large part, by assessing what successful, efficient
learners do. It has been found that they use numerous strategies across subjects
and tasks, such as those listed above under "cognitive strategies". They know
when to use strategies and for what purposes. An attempt to identify the most
essential strategies students should learn is an impossible task; it depends
on the needs of the learner and the requirements of the curriculum. However,
student use of the following strategies often leads to improved student performance
(lists are not inclusive):
- Computation and problem-solving: Verbalization,
visualization, chunking, making associations, use of cues.
- Memory: Visualization, verbalization, mnemonics,
making associations, chunking, and writing. These are usually more effective
when used in combinations.
- Productivity: Verbalization, self-monitoring,
visualization, use of cues.
- Reading accuracy and fluency: Finger pointing
or tracking, sounding out unknown words, self-questioning for accuracy, chunking,
and using contextual clues.
- Reading comprehension: Visualization, questioning,
rereading, predicting.
- Writing: Planning, revising, questioning, use
of cues, verbalization, visualization, checking and monitoring. How are students
taught to use strategies? Effective strategy instruction is an integral part
of classroom instruction, regardless of the content being taught; it is not
an additional subject. In the transactional strategies instruction (TSI) model,
strategies instruction takes place all year long with the teacher giving explanations
and modeling. Teachers continually praise students for using strategies and
use teachable moments to discuss them. Students are encouraged to help their
peers become more strategic.
What are the basic steps in teaching strategy use?
The following order of steps should be followed:
- Describe the strategy. Students obtain an understanding of the strategy
and its purpose-why it is important, when it can be used, and how to use it.
- Model its use. The teacher models the strategy, explaining to the students
how to perform it.
- Provide ample assisted practice time. The teacher monitors, provides cues,
and gives feedback. Practice results in automaticity so the student doesn't
have to "think" about using the strategy.
- Promote student self-monitoring and evaluation of personal strategy use.
Students will likely use the strategy if they see how it works for them; it
will become part of their learning schema.
- Encourage continued use and generalization of the strategy. Students are
encouraged to try the strategy in other learning situations.
To what extent is strategy instruction taking place in classrooms?
Currently, there are little data available to determine how many teachers teach
strategic learning skills, how many are even aware of their existence, or if
they are aware, have the skills to teach them. Few teachers demonstrate to their
students their own personal strategy use. In general, teachers are not aware
of the importance of these skills. The fact that there is such little data leads
to the assumption that strategy instruction is not a general classroom practice.
Following are a few possible explanations for this:
- Early strategy instruction research was done specifically with learning
disabled populations. General education preservice and inservice programs
have not generalized these research findings to all learners.
- How students learn takes a back seat to what is learned. Teachers assume
students will "get it" on their own, or with more teacher-directed instruction
or practice.
- The idea of focusing on the learner is still in its infancy.
- "Educator overload" is a factor. Teachers, experiencing the pressures of
accountability for student progress, feel they don't have time to "learn one
more thing," especially something they are not convinced will improve student
learning.
Numerous researchers are assisting educators in turning strategies research
into practice. An increasing number of strategies instruction curricula are
available, especially in reading and writing.
Resources
Beckman, P. & Weller, C. (1990). Active, independent learning for children
with learning disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 21/22, 26-29.
Cornford, I.R. (2002, 7 December). Learning-to-learn skills for lifelong
learning: Some implications for curriculum development and teacher education.
Paper presented at the AARE annual conference, Sydney.
De La Paz, S. (1999). Self-regulated strategy instruction in regular education
settings: Improving outcomes for students with and without learning disabilities.
Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14, 92-118.
De La Paz, S., Owen, B., Harris, K. & Graham, S. (2000). Riding Elvis' Motorcycle:
Using self-regulated strategy development to PLAN and WRITE for a state writing
exam. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 101-109.
Deshler, D.D., Schumaker, J.B., Lenz, B.K., Bulgren, J.A., Hock, M.F., Knight,
J., & Ehren, B J. (2001). Ensuring content-area learning by secondary students
with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16,
96-108.
Hamman, D. (1998). Preservice teachers' value for learning-strategy instruction.
Journal of Experimental Education, 66, 209-222.
Harris, K.R. & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies
for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge: MA: Brookline Books.
Keene, E.O. & Zimmermann, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought. Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Logan, J.W., Olson, M.W., & Lindsey, T.P. (1993). Lessons from champion spellers.
Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 89-96.
Meichenbaum, D. & Biemiller, A. (1998). Nurturing independent learners.
Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Pressley, M. & Woloshyn, V. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that
really improves children's academic performance. Cambridge, MA: Brookline
Books.
Top of Page Back to ERIC Menu Back
to Hoagies' Gifted Education Page
copyright ©2002
ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education